Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:31

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Cal Raleigh’s heroics can’t save Mariners as Orioles complete sweep - The Seattle Times
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Massive iron reserve worth trillions discovered could reshape the global economy - Glass Almanac
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Does centrifugal force teach us about gravity?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What are the most popular bedroom furniture designs in 2024?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Scientists Stumble Upon Mysterious Lifeform They Can’t Yet Explain - The Daily Galaxy
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How does it feel to be in a marriage without any love?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.